Happy new year!
Group theory warm-up exercise for the year: what are all the groups of order 2024?
Last year we did 2023, which was rather boring because all groups of order are abelian. This year the possibilities are much more numerous and the calculation is somewhat involved.
There are some easy initial reductions using Sylow’s theorem. Let be a group of order
. Sylow’s theorem implies that there must be a unique subgroup
of order
. Similarly, in the quotient
of order
there must be a unique subgroup of order
. Therefore
has a unique subgroup
of order
. Let
be a Sylow
-subgroup of
. Then
for some homomorphism
.
We can easily list the possibilities for and
. There are just two possibilities for
: the cyclic group
and the unique nonabelian semidirect product
. There are five possibilities for
:
,
,
, the dihedral group
, and the quaternion group
.
Next, for each choice of and
, we must consider all possibilities for
. However, in order to avoid duplication, we must determine when two homomorphisms
induce isomorphic semidirect products.
A quick word about notation. Following standard practice in group theory, we denote group actions on the right. If and
are elements of a common group
, we denote by
the conjugate
. We also denote by
the image of
under a given homomorphism
. We can then say that the semidirect product
is generated by copies of
and
subject to the natural-looking relation
This relation asserts that the conjugation action of on
is given by
.
Suppose is an isomorphism from
to
such that
. Then
induces an automorphism
of
as well as an automorphism
of
. These automorphisms are not arbitrary: they satisfy a certain compatibility relation. Namely, for all
and
we have
In other words, for all we have, in
,
Written a third way, we have, as elements of ,
where denotes the inner automorphism of
induced by
. (Alternatively, if somewhat more traditionally we denote function composition in a right-to-left manner, the compatibility relation is
.)
Let us denote by the set of all isomorphisms
such that
, and by
the set of all compatible isomorphism pairs
, i.e.,
The import of the previous paragraph is that there is a natural map . Moreover this map is surjective (though typically not injective), because if
is a compatible isomorphism pair then the map
defined by
is an isomorphism (easy exercise). In particular, there is an isomorphism
from
to
such that
if and only if
, i.e., if and only if there is a pair of compatible automorphisms
.
We can phrase this conclusion another way. Observe that acts naturally on
. The
factor acts by precomposition, while the
factor acts by conjugation. Isomorphism classes of split extensions
are in bijection with orbits of
in
. (Here we consider
and
to be isomorphic as extensions if and only if there is an isomorphism
such that
. In general this is more restrictive than mere isomorphism as groups.)
Now consider the special case in which . In this case
is a subgroup of
and
is a subgroup of
, and the natural map
is a homomorphism. Let
be the kernel. Then
consists of all isomorphism
that restrict to the identity on
and induce the identity on
. This implies that there is a map
such that
for all
. Since
restricts to the identity on
, we have
which implies that takes values in the centre
of
. Moreover,
is a homomorphism
, so we must have the relation
This relation means that is a crossed homomorphism from
to
. The group of crossed homomorphisms
is usually denoted
. Thus we have a short exact sequence
In particular, if is a characteristic subgroup of
,
is the full automorphism group, so we have a short exact sequence
In fact can be identified with the subgroup of automorphisms of
preserving
, so this sequence splits and we find that
Let us put all this into practice. Recall that we have two possibilities for :
or
. Let us consider the case
first. We have
For each choice of among
we must tabulate the homomorphisms
up to the action of
by precomposition and the conjugation action of
. Since
is abelian, the latter action is trivial. Any such homomorphism must take values in the Sylow
-subgroup
, so we are reduced to tabulating homomorphisms
up to automorphisms of
.
Case : There are four. Among these are groups with the structures
,
,
. The last has the structure
, and the action of
on
is fixed-point-free.
Case : Write
. Any homomorphism
must kill
, so factors through
. Naively are
homomorphisms
, but
acts by swapping
and
(while
is fixed) and the number of orbits of homomorphisms
is
. These groups include
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
others.
Case : There are
homomorphisms
, but only
up to the action of
. They are in bijection with subgroups of
. The corresponding groups of order
are
,
,
,
, and
.
Case : Any homomorphism
factors through
. Just as in the case of
there are
homomorphisms
up to the action of
. The groups of order
include
and
in which
acts nontrivially on
by conjugation.
Case : Any homomorphism
factors through
. In this case
acts on
as
, so as in the case of
there are just
homomorphisms
up to automorphisms of
. Thus there are
semidirect products of the form
.
Now consider the case in which is nonabelian. Since
is a characteristic subgroup of
(being the only subgroup of order
), we have
where is the subgroup of
consisting of compatible pairs. Consider the compatibility relation
. Since
is abelian,
is trivial, so the relation reduces to
. Since
is injective, this implies that
is trivial. Therefore
. Meanwhile one checks that
. Therefore
. Now if
has order
then any homomorphism
takes values in a Sylow
-subgroup isomorphic to
, which are all conjugate. Tabulating homomorphisms
up to the natural action of
is therefore equivalent to tabulating homomorphisms
up to automorphisms of
, which just amounts to tabulating automorphism classes of subgroups of
of index at most
. This case is therefore somewhat easier than the previous one.
Case : There are just two. The corresponding groups of order
have the forms
and
.
Case : There are three, corresponding to subgroups isomorphic to
,
, and
. The corresponding groups of order
include
,
,
.
Case : There are two, since all index-
subgroups are essentially the same. The corresponding groups of order
are
and
.
Case : There are three, since there is a unique subgroup isomorphic to
while the two subgroups isomorphic to
are equivalent by an automorphism. There are three corresponding groups with structure
.
Case : There are two, since the three subgroups of
isomorphic to
are equivalent by automorphisms. Thus there are just two groups with the structure
.
Thus altogether there are groups of order
.